Swan 36 Frers vs Swan 60OD
How do the Swan 36 Frers and Swan 60OD compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 36 Frers 
Swan 60OD | Swan 36 Frers | Swan 60OD | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.7 ft9.06 m | 61.9 ft18.86 m |
| Waterline length | 29.7 ft9.06 m | 54.8 ft16.70 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.65 m | 16.7 ft5.09 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 14,771 lb6,700 kg | 42,990 lb19,500 kg |
| Ballast | 5,600 lb2,540 kg | 16,975 lb7,700 kg |
| Sail area | 624 ft²58.0 m² | 2,378 ft²220.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.58 | 31.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.1 | 27.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.91 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 9.9 |
Swan 36 Frers vs Swan 60OD: the short version
- The Swan 60OD is the larger boat at 61.9 ft18.86 m LOA versus 29.7 ft9.06 m for the Swan 36 Frers.
- The Swan 60OD is heavier, displacing about 191% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 60OD carries the more powerful rig (31.0 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 36 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 60OD rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.