Swan 37 vs Swan 38
How do the Swan 37 and Swan 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 37 
Swan 38 | Swan 37 | Swan 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 28.7 ft8.75 m |
| Waterline length | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 28.7 ft8.75 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 11.6 ft3.52 m |
| Draft | 6.4 ft1.95 m | 6.6 ft2.00 m |
| Displacement | 15,400 lb6,985 kg | 18,739 lb8,500 kg |
| Ballast | 7,300 lb3,311 kg | 7,100 lb3,221 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 667 ft²62.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 15.13 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 354 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.9 | 38.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.61 | 1.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.2 |
Swan 37 vs Swan 38: the short version
- The Swan 37 is the larger boat at 37.0 ft11.28 m LOA versus 28.7 ft8.75 m for the Swan 38.
- The Swan 38 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 37 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 1.74).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.