Swan 37 vs Swan 43 Holland
How do the Swan 37 and Swan 43 Holland compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 37 
Swan 43 Holland | Swan 37 | Swan 43 Holland | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 34.1 ft10.40 m |
| Waterline length | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 34.1 ft10.40 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 13.1 ft4.00 m |
| Draft | 6.4 ft1.95 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 15,400 lb6,985 kg | 23,369 lb10,600 kg |
| Ballast | 7,300 lb3,311 kg | 9,040 lb4,100 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 879 ft²81.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 17.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 263 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.9 | 34.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.61 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.8 |
Swan 37 vs Swan 43 Holland: the short version
- The Swan 37 is the larger boat at 37.0 ft11.28 m LOA versus 34.1 ft10.40 m for the Swan 43 Holland.
- The Swan 43 Holland is heavier, displacing about 52% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 37 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.