Swan 37 vs Swan 60
How do the Swan 37 and Swan 60 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 37 
Swan 60 | Swan 37 | Swan 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Waterline length | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 17.6 ft5.35 m |
| Draft | 6.4 ft1.95 m | 11.4 ft3.47 m |
| Displacement | 15,400 lb6,985 kg | 51,809 lb23,500 kg |
| Ballast | 7,300 lb3,311 kg | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 178 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.9 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.61 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 9.5 |
Swan 37 vs Swan 60: the short version
- The Swan 60 is the larger boat at 50.7 ft15.45 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.28 m for the Swan 37.
- The Swan 60 is heavier, displacing about 236% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 37 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 1.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.