Swan 37 vs Swan 601
How do the Swan 37 and Swan 601 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 37 
Swan 601 | Swan 37 | Swan 601 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 60.0 ft18.30 m |
| Waterline length | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 52.9 ft16.13 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 14.9 ft4.54 m |
| Draft | 6.4 ft1.95 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 15,400 lb6,985 kg | 39,683 lb18,000 kg |
| Ballast | 7,300 lb3,311 kg | 18,700 lb8,482 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 2,380 ft²221.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 32.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 120 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.9 | 30.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.61 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 9.7 |
Swan 37 vs Swan 601: the short version
- The Swan 601 is the larger boat at 60.0 ft18.30 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.28 m for the Swan 37.
- The Swan 601 is heavier, displacing about 158% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 37 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 1.75).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.