Swan 38 vs Swan 60
How do the Swan 38 and Swan 60 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 38 
Swan 60 | Swan 38 | Swan 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.7 ft8.75 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Waterline length | 28.7 ft8.75 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.52 m | 17.6 ft5.35 m |
| Draft | 6.6 ft2.00 m | 11.4 ft3.47 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 51,809 lb23,500 kg |
| Ballast | 7,100 lb3,221 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 667 ft²62.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 15.13 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 354 | 178 |
| Comfort ratio | 38.8 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.74 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 9.5 |
Swan 38 vs Swan 60: the short version
- The Swan 60 is the larger boat at 50.7 ft15.45 m LOA versus 28.7 ft8.75 m for the Swan 38.
- The Swan 60 is heavier, displacing about 176% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 38 rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 1.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.