Swan 391 vs Swan 54
How do the Swan 391 and Swan 54 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 391 
Swan 54 | Swan 391 | Swan 54 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.1 ft10.08 m | 47.2 ft14.40 m |
| Waterline length | 33.1 ft10.08 m | 47.2 ft14.40 m |
| Beam | 12.4 ft3.79 m | 15.6 ft4.75 m |
| Draft | 7.2 ft2.19 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Displacement | 18,900 lb8,573 kg | 48,502 lb22,000 kg |
| Ballast | 6,800 lb3,084 kg | 18,078 lb8,200 kg |
| Sail area | 767 ft²71.3 m² | 1,538 ft²142.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.30 | 18.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 233 | 205 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.8 | 41.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.87 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 9.2 |
Swan 391 vs Swan 54: the short version
- The Swan 54 is the larger boat at 47.2 ft14.40 m LOA versus 33.1 ft10.08 m for the Swan 391.
- The Swan 54 is heavier, displacing about 157% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 54 carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 54 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 54 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.87).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.