Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 45
How do the Swan 43 Holland and Swan 45 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 43 Holland 
Swan 45 | Swan 43 Holland | Swan 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 45.4 ft13.83 m |
| Waterline length | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 39.6 ft12.07 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft4.00 m | 12.8 ft3.91 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Displacement | 23,369 lb10,600 kg | 21,716 lb9,850 kg |
| Ballast | 9,040 lb4,100 kg | 8,620 lb3,910 kg |
| Sail area | 879 ft²81.7 m² | 1,411 ft²131.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.21 | 29.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 263 | 156 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.3 | 27.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.8 | 8.4 |
Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 45: the short version
- The Swan 45 is the larger boat at 45.4 ft13.83 m LOA versus 34.1 ft10.40 m for the Swan 43 Holland.
- The Swan 43 Holland is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 45 carries the more powerful rig (29.0 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 43 Holland scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 43 Holland rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.