Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 48 Frers
How do the Swan 43 Holland and Swan 48 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 43 Holland 
Swan 48 Frers | Swan 43 Holland | Swan 48 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft4.00 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 7.8 ft2.38 m |
| Displacement | 23,369 lb10,600 kg | 31,526 lb14,300 kg |
| Ballast | 9,040 lb4,100 kg | 12,100 lb5,488 kg |
| Sail area | 879 ft²81.7 m² | 1,142 ft²106.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.21 | 18.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 263 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.3 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.8 | 8.6 |
Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 48 Frers: the short version
- The Swan 48 Frers is the larger boat at 41.0 ft12.50 m LOA versus 34.1 ft10.40 m for the Swan 43 Holland.
- The Swan 48 Frers is heavier, displacing about 35% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 48 Frers carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 48 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 48 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.