Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 60
How do the Swan 43 Holland and Swan 60 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 43 Holland 
Swan 60 | Swan 43 Holland | Swan 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Waterline length | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft4.00 m | 17.6 ft5.35 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 11.4 ft3.47 m |
| Displacement | 23,369 lb10,600 kg | 51,809 lb23,500 kg |
| Ballast | 9,040 lb4,100 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 879 ft²81.7 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 17.21 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 263 | 178 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.3 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.8 | 9.5 |
Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 60: the short version
- The Swan 60 is the larger boat at 50.7 ft15.45 m LOA versus 34.1 ft10.40 m for the Swan 43 Holland.
- The Swan 60 is heavier, displacing about 122% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 60 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 43 Holland rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.