Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 601
How do the Swan 43 Holland and Swan 601 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 43 Holland 
Swan 601 | Swan 43 Holland | Swan 601 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 60.0 ft18.30 m |
| Waterline length | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 52.9 ft16.13 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft4.00 m | 14.9 ft4.54 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 23,369 lb10,600 kg | 39,683 lb18,000 kg |
| Ballast | 9,040 lb4,100 kg | 18,700 lb8,482 kg |
| Sail area | 879 ft²81.7 m² | 2,380 ft²221.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.21 | 32.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 263 | 120 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.3 | 30.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.8 | 9.7 |
Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 601: the short version
- The Swan 601 is the larger boat at 60.0 ft18.30 m LOA versus 34.1 ft10.40 m for the Swan 43 Holland.
- The Swan 601 is heavier, displacing about 70% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 601 carries the more powerful rig (32.7 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 43 Holland scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 601 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.