Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 60OD
How do the Swan 43 Holland and Swan 60OD compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 43 Holland 
Swan 60OD | Swan 43 Holland | Swan 60OD | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 61.9 ft18.86 m |
| Waterline length | 34.1 ft10.40 m | 54.8 ft16.70 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft4.00 m | 16.7 ft5.09 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 23,369 lb10,600 kg | 42,990 lb19,500 kg |
| Ballast | 9,040 lb4,100 kg | 16,975 lb7,700 kg |
| Sail area | 879 ft²81.7 m² | 2,378 ft²220.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.21 | 31.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 263 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.3 | 27.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.91 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.8 | 9.9 |
Swan 43 Holland vs Swan 60OD: the short version
- The Swan 60OD is the larger boat at 61.9 ft18.86 m LOA versus 34.1 ft10.40 m for the Swan 43 Holland.
- The Swan 60OD is heavier, displacing about 84% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 60OD carries the more powerful rig (31.0 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 43 Holland scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 43 Holland rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.91).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.