Swan 45 vs Swan 60
How do the Swan 45 and Swan 60 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 45 
Swan 60 | Swan 45 | Swan 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 45.4 ft13.83 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Waterline length | 39.6 ft12.07 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Beam | 12.8 ft3.91 m | 17.6 ft5.35 m |
| Draft | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 11.4 ft3.47 m |
| Displacement | 21,716 lb9,850 kg | 51,809 lb23,500 kg |
| Ballast | 8,620 lb3,910 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 1,411 ft²131.1 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 29.00 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 178 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 9.5 |
Swan 45 vs Swan 60: the short version
- The Swan 60 is the larger boat at 50.7 ft15.45 m LOA versus 45.4 ft13.83 m for the Swan 45.
- The Swan 60 is heavier, displacing about 139% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 60 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 45 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.