Swan 45 vs Swan 60OD
How do the Swan 45 and Swan 60OD compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 45 
Swan 60OD | Swan 45 | Swan 60OD | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 45.4 ft13.83 m | 61.9 ft18.86 m |
| Waterline length | 39.6 ft12.07 m | 54.8 ft16.70 m |
| Beam | 12.8 ft3.91 m | 16.7 ft5.09 m |
| Draft | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 21,716 lb9,850 kg | 42,990 lb19,500 kg |
| Ballast | 8,620 lb3,910 kg | 16,975 lb7,700 kg |
| Sail area | 1,411 ft²131.1 m² | 2,378 ft²220.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 29.00 | 31.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 27.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.91 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 9.9 |
Swan 45 vs Swan 60OD: the short version
- The Swan 60OD is the larger boat at 61.9 ft18.86 m LOA versus 45.4 ft13.83 m for the Swan 45.
- The Swan 60OD is heavier, displacing about 98% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 60OD carries the more powerful rig (31.0 vs 29.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 60OD scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 45 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.91).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.