Tartan 33 vs Tartan 34-2
How do the Tartan 33 and Tartan 34-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Tartan 33 
Tartan 34-2 | Tartan 33 | Tartan 34-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.7 ft10.26 m | 34.4 ft10.49 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.79 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 11.0 ft3.34 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.39 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 10,000 lb4,536 kg | 11,000 lb4,990 kg |
| Ballast | 4,400 lb1,996 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 531 ft²49.3 m² | 538 ft²50.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.30 | 17.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 186 | 205 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.0 | 23.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Tartan 33 vs Tartan 34-2: the short version
- The Tartan 34-2 is the larger boat at 34.4 ft10.49 m LOA versus 33.7 ft10.26 m for the Tartan 33.
- The Tartan 34-2 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tartan 33 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tartan 34-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tartan 34-2 rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.