Tartan 34-2 vs Tartan Ten
How do the Tartan 34-2 and Tartan Ten compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Tartan 34-2 
Tartan Ten | Tartan 34-2 | Tartan Ten | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.4 ft10.49 m | 33.1 ft10.10 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.79 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 7,100 lb3,221 kg |
| Ballast | 4,400 lb1,996 kg | 3,340 lb1,515 kg |
| Sail area | 538 ft²50.0 m² | 487 ft²45.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.40 | 21.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 161 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.0 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.0 |
Tartan 34-2 vs Tartan Ten: the short version
- The Tartan 34-2 is the larger boat at 34.4 ft10.49 m LOA versus 33.1 ft10.10 m for the Tartan Ten.
- The Tartan 34-2 is heavier, displacing about 55% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tartan Ten carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tartan 34-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tartan Ten rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 1.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.