Tartan 34 C vs Tartan Ten
How do the Tartan 34 C and Tartan Ten compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Tartan 34 C 
Tartan Ten | Tartan 34 C | Tartan Ten | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.4 ft10.49 m | 33.1 ft10.10 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 11,200 lb5,080 kg | 7,100 lb3,221 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 3,340 lb1,515 kg |
| Sail area | 527 ft²49.0 m² | 487 ft²45.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.84 | 21.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 320 | 161 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.3 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.82 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 7.0 |
Tartan 34 C vs Tartan Ten: the short version
- The Tartan 34 C is the larger boat at 34.4 ft10.49 m LOA versus 33.1 ft10.10 m for the Tartan Ten.
- The Tartan 34 C is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tartan Ten carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tartan 34 C scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tartan 34 C rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 1.93).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.