Tech Dinghy vs Wild Green
How do the Tech Dinghy and Wild Green compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Tech Dinghy | Wild Green | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 12.0 ft3.65 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 2.1 ft0.65 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | —— |
| Displacement | 250 lb113 kg | 39 lb18 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 72 ft²6.7 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 29.03 | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.97 | 2.51 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Tech Dinghy vs Wild Green: the short version
- The Tech Dinghy and Wild Green are close in length (12.0 ft3.66 m vs 12.0 ft3.65 m ).
- The Tech Dinghy is heavier, displacing about 541% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Wild Green rates better for offshore work (2.51 vs 2.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.