Thames Marine Mirage 29 vs Watkins 29
How do the Thames Marine Mirage 29 and Watkins 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Thames Marine Mirage 29 | Thames Marine Mirage 29 | Watkins 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.8 ft8.79 m | 28.9 ft8.81 m |
| Waterline length | 25.3 ft7.70 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 8,267 lb3,750 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 353 ft²32.8 m² | 370 ft²34.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.81 | 13.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 229 | 284 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.2 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Thames Marine Mirage 29 vs Watkins 29: the short version
- The Thames Marine Mirage 29 and Watkins 29 are close in length (28.8 ft8.79 m vs 28.9 ft8.81 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 29 carries the more powerful rig (13.9 vs 13.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 29 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.