Viking 28 vs Viking 33
How do the Viking 28 and Viking 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Viking 28 
Viking 33 | Viking 28 | Viking 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.2 ft8.59 m | 33.6 ft10.24 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 27.2 ft8.28 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.55 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 4,775 lb2,166 kg | 8,807 lb3,995 kg |
| Ballast | 2,250 lb1,021 kg | 4,512 lb2,047 kg |
| Sail area | 317 ft²29.5 m² | 519 ft²48.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.89 | 19.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 200 | 196 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.3 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 7.0 |
Viking 28 vs Viking 33: the short version
- The Viking 33 is the larger boat at 33.6 ft10.24 m LOA versus 28.2 ft8.59 m for the Viking 28.
- The Viking 33 is heavier, displacing about 84% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Viking 33 carries the more powerful rig (19.5 vs 17.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Viking 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Viking 33 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.