Viking 33 vs Viking 34
How do the Viking 33 and Viking 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Viking 33 
Viking 34 | Viking 33 | Viking 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.6 ft10.24 m | 33.6 ft10.24 m |
| Waterline length | 27.2 ft8.28 m | 27.2 ft8.28 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 8,807 lb3,995 kg | 8,900 lb4,037 kg |
| Ballast | 4,512 lb2,047 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Sail area | 519 ft²48.2 m² | 540 ft²50.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.47 | 20.12 |
| Displacement / Length | 196 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 22.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Viking 33 vs Viking 34: the short version
- The Viking 33 and Viking 34 are close in length (33.6 ft10.24 m vs 33.6 ft10.24 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Viking 34 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 19.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Viking 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Viking 34 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 1.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.