Watkins 25 vs Watkins 29
How do the Watkins 25 and Watkins 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Watkins 25 | Watkins 25 | Watkins 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 28.9 ft8.81 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 4,800 lb2,177 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Ballast | 1,900 lb862 kg | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 261 ft²24.2 m² | 370 ft²34.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.68 | 13.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 231 | 284 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.3 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.6 |
Watkins 25 vs Watkins 29: the short version
- The Watkins 29 is the larger boat at 28.9 ft8.81 m LOA versus 24.9 ft7.60 m for the Watkins 25.
- The Watkins 29 is heavier, displacing about 83% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 25 carries the more powerful rig (14.7 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 29 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.