Watkins 25 vs Watkins 36C
How do the Watkins 25 and Watkins 36C compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Watkins 25 | Watkins 25 | Watkins 36C | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 4,800 lb2,177 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 1,900 lb862 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Sail area | 261 ft²24.2 m² | 529 ft²49.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.68 | 12.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 231 | 301 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.3 | 36.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 7.3 |
Watkins 25 vs Watkins 36C: the short version
- The Watkins 36C is the larger boat at 36.0 ft10.97 m LOA versus 24.9 ft7.60 m for the Watkins 25.
- The Watkins 36C is heavier, displacing about 254% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 25 carries the more powerful rig (14.7 vs 12.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 36C scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 36C rates better for offshore work (1.63 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.