Watkins 27P vs Watkins 29
How do the Watkins 27P and Watkins 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Watkins 27P | Watkins 27P | Watkins 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 28.9 ft8.81 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.09 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,500 lb3,402 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Ballast | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 292 ft²27.1 m² | 370 ft²34.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.19 | 13.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 266 | 284 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.1 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.6 |
Watkins 27P vs Watkins 29: the short version
- The Watkins 29 is the larger boat at 28.9 ft8.81 m LOA versus 27.0 ft8.23 m for the Watkins 27P.
- The Watkins 29 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 29 carries the more powerful rig (13.9 vs 12.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 29 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.