Watkins 27P vs Watkins 36C
How do the Watkins 27P and Watkins 36C compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Watkins 27P | Watkins 27P | Watkins 36C | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.09 m | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 7,500 lb3,402 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Sail area | 292 ft²27.1 m² | 529 ft²49.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.19 | 12.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 266 | 301 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.1 | 36.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 1.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 7.3 |
Watkins 27P vs Watkins 36C: the short version
- The Watkins 36C is the larger boat at 36.0 ft10.97 m LOA versus 27.0 ft8.23 m for the Watkins 27P.
- The Watkins 36C is heavier, displacing about 127% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 36C carries the more powerful rig (12.8 vs 12.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 36C scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 36C rates better for offshore work (1.63 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.