Watkins 29 vs Watkins 33
How do the Watkins 29 and Watkins 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Watkins 29 | Watkins 29 | Watkins 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.9 ft8.81 m | 33.1 ft10.08 m |
| Waterline length | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 26.6 ft8.10 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 8,800 lb3,992 kg | 11,200 lb5,080 kg |
| Ballast | 3,900 lb1,769 kg | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Sail area | 370 ft²34.4 m² | 469 ft²43.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.89 | 14.99 |
| Displacement / Length | 284 | 266 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.8 | 27.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.9 |
Watkins 29 vs Watkins 33: the short version
- The Watkins 33 is the larger boat at 33.1 ft10.08 m LOA versus 28.9 ft8.81 m for the Watkins 29.
- The Watkins 33 is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 33 carries the more powerful rig (15.0 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 33 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.