Watkins 29 vs Watkins 36
How do the Watkins 29 and Watkins 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Watkins 29 | Watkins 29 | Watkins 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.9 ft8.81 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 8,800 lb3,992 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 3,900 lb1,769 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Sail area | 370 ft²34.4 m² | 529 ft²49.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.89 | 12.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 284 | 301 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.8 | 36.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.3 |
Watkins 29 vs Watkins 36: the short version
- The Watkins 36 is the larger boat at 36.0 ft10.97 m LOA versus 28.9 ft8.81 m for the Watkins 29.
- The Watkins 36 is heavier, displacing about 93% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 29 carries the more powerful rig (13.9 vs 12.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 36 rates better for offshore work (1.63 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.