Alberg 30 vs Alberg 37
How do the Alberg 30 and Alberg 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 30 
Alberg 37 | Alberg 30 | Alberg 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.23 m | 37.2 ft11.33 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 26.5 ft8.08 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.31 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 16,800 lb7,620 kg |
| Ballast | 3,300 lb1,497 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Sail area | 410 ft²38.1 m² | 647 ft²60.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.16 | 15.78 |
| Displacement / Length | 395 | 403 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.9 | 39.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.9 |
Alberg 30 vs Alberg 37: the short version
- The Alberg 37 is the larger boat at 37.2 ft11.33 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.23 m for the Alberg 30.
- The Alberg 37 is heavier, displacing about 87% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Alberg 37 carries the more powerful rig (15.8 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 37 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 1.68).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.