Albin Ballad vs Beneteau Figaro 1
How do the Albin Ballad and Beneteau Figaro 1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Ballad 
Beneteau Figaro 1 | Albin Ballad | Beneteau Figaro 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.96 m | 10.7 ft3.25 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 5,291 lb2,400 kg |
| Ballast | 3,527 lb1,600 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 538 ft²50.0 m² | 512 ft²47.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.93 | 26.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 280 | 113 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.9 | 12.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 2.45 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | €9,900 | — |
Albin Ballad vs Beneteau Figaro 1: the short version
- The Albin Ballad and Beneteau Figaro 1 are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The Albin Ballad is heavier, displacing about 37% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 1 carries the more powerful rig (27.0 vs 22.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin Ballad scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin Ballad rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.