Albin Vega vs Cumulus 28
How do the Albin Vega and Cumulus 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Albin Vega | Cumulus 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.1 ft8.25 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 22.3 ft6.81 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.46 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 5,070 lb2,300 kg | 7,055 lb3,200 kg |
| Ballast | 2,017 lb915 kg | 2,812 lb1,276 kg |
| Sail area | 304 ft²28.2 m² | 363 ft²33.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.48 | 15.79 |
| Displacement / Length | 186 | 283 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.0 | 23.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.88 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €3,500 | — |
Albin Vega vs Cumulus 28: the short version
- The Cumulus 28 is the larger boat at 28.1 ft8.56 m LOA versus 27.1 ft8.25 m for the Albin Vega.
- The Cumulus 28 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Vega carries the more powerful rig (16.5 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cumulus 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin Vega rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 1.93).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Albin Vega