Allegro 27 vs Hunter 27 Edge
How do the Allegro 27 and Hunter 27 Edge compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Allegro 27 | Allegro 27 | Hunter 27 Edge | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.4 ft8.03 m | 26.4 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 334 ft²31.0 m² | 288 ft²26.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.95 | 20.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 241 | 109 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.9 | 12.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €6,200 | — |
Allegro 27 vs Hunter 27 Edge: the short version
- The Allegro 27 and Hunter 27 Edge are close in length (26.4 ft8.03 m vs 26.4 ft8.03 m ).
- The Allegro 27 is heavier, displacing about 117% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 27 Edge carries the more powerful rig (20.2 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Allegro 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Allegro 27 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.