Aquarius 23 vs Monark 700
How do the Aquarius 23 and Monark 700 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aquarius 23 | Aquarius 23 | Monark 700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.7 ft6.91 m | 22.6 ft6.90 m |
| Waterline length | 21.2 ft6.45 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 2,280 lb1,034 kg | 3,086 lb1,400 kg |
| Ballast | 815 lb370 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Sail area | 218 ft²20.3 m² | 231 ft²21.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.14 | 17.44 |
| Displacement / Length | 107 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.3 | 14.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.41 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €4,500 |
Aquarius 23 vs Monark 700: the short version
- The Aquarius 23 and Monark 700 are close in length (22.7 ft6.91 m vs 22.6 ft6.90 m ).
- The Monark 700 is heavier, displacing about 35% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Aquarius 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Monark 700 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Monark 700 rates better for offshore work (2.25 vs 2.41).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.