Archambault A35 vs Archambault A35R
How do the Archambault A35 and Archambault A35R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35 | Archambault A35 | Archambault A35R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.7 ft10.59 m | 36.3 ft11.06 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.29 m | 30.2 ft9.20 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.55 m | 11.6 ft3.53 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.10 m | 7.2 ft2.19 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 9,811 lb4,450 kg |
| Ballast | 4,387 lb1,990 kg | 4,630 lb2,100 kg |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | 727 ft²67.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | 25.38 |
| Displacement / Length | 155 | 159 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 18.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.4 |
Archambault A35 vs Archambault A35R: the short version
- The Archambault A35R is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.06 m LOA versus 34.7 ft10.59 m for the Archambault A35.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A35R carries the more powerful rig (25.4 vs 25.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35R rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.