Archambault A40 vs Archambault A40RC
How do the Archambault A40 and Archambault A40RC compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A40 | Archambault A40 | Archambault A40RC | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.3 ft11.99 m | 39.3 ft11.98 m |
| Waterline length | 36.9 ft11.25 m | 34.6 ft10.54 m |
| Beam | 12.3 ft3.76 m | 12.3 ft3.75 m |
| Draft | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 8.1 ft2.48 m |
| Displacement | 13,669 lb6,200 kg | 14,661 lb6,650 kg |
| Ballast | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 6,834 lb3,100 kg |
| Sail area | 838 ft²77.9 m² | 980 ft²91.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.45 | 26.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 158 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 7.9 |
Archambault A40 vs Archambault A40RC: the short version
- The Archambault A40 and Archambault A40RC are close in length (39.3 ft11.99 m vs 39.3 ft11.98 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A40RC carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 23.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A40RC scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40RC rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.