Archambault Coco vs Ohlson 22
How do the Archambault Coco and Ohlson 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Coco | Archambault Coco | Ohlson 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.20 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.36 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 2,535 lb1,150 kg | 3,527 lb1,600 kg |
| Ballast | 992 lb450 kg | 1,213 lb550 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.53 | 20.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 134 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.4 | 17.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €1,500 |
Archambault Coco vs Ohlson 22: the short version
- The Archambault Coco and Ohlson 22 are close in length (21.3 ft6.50 m vs 21.3 ft6.50 m ).
- The Ohlson 22 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Coco carries the more powerful rig (24.5 vs 20.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ohlson 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ohlson 22 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.