B Boats B-32 vs Bayfield 30/32
How do the B Boats B-32 and Bayfield 30/32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
B Boats B-32 
Bayfield 30/32 | B Boats B-32 | Bayfield 30/32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 23.3 ft7.09 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 6.4 ft1.96 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 4,100 lb1,860 kg | 9,600 lb4,354 kg |
| Ballast | 1,650 lb748 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 31.23 | 15.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 88 | 341 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.8 | 25.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.58 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 6.5 |
B Boats B-32 vs Bayfield 30/32: the short version
- The B Boats B-32 and Bayfield 30/32 are close in length (32.0 ft9.75 m vs 32.0 ft9.75 m ).
- The Bayfield 30/32 is heavier, displacing about 134% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the B Boats B-32 carries the more powerful rig (31.2 vs 15.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bayfield 30/32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bayfield 30/32 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.