BB 10 vs Pearson Vanguard
How do the BB 10 and Pearson Vanguard compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
BB 10 | BB 10 | Pearson Vanguard | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 32.8 ft10.00 m |
| Waterline length | 23.9 ft7.29 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 9.3 ft2.83 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.46 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 4,956 lb2,248 kg | 10,300 lb4,672 kg |
| Ballast | 2,700 lb1,225 kg | 4,250 lb1,928 kg |
| Sail area | 358 ft²33.3 m² | 469 ft²43.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.71 | 15.85 |
| Displacement / Length | 162 | 409 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.5 | 32.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.3 |
BB 10 vs Pearson Vanguard: the short version
- The BB 10 and Pearson Vanguard are close in length (32.8 ft10.00 m vs 32.8 ft10.00 m ).
- The Pearson Vanguard is heavier, displacing about 108% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the BB 10 carries the more powerful rig (19.7 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Vanguard scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Vanguard rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.77).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.