Beachcomber 25 vs Bombardier 7.6
How do the Beachcomber 25 and Bombardier 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beachcomber 25 
Bombardier 7.6 | Beachcomber 25 | Bombardier 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.72 m | 25.3 ft7.72 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 3,300 lb1,497 kg |
| Ballast | 1,600 lb726 kg | 985 lb447 kg |
| Sail area | 275 ft²25.5 m² | 299 ft²27.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.66 | 21.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 191 | 129 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.2 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Beachcomber 25 vs Bombardier 7.6: the short version
- The Beachcomber 25 and Bombardier 7.6 are close in length (25.3 ft7.72 m vs 25.3 ft7.72 m ).
- The Beachcomber 25 is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bombardier 7.6 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 14.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beachcomber 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beachcomber 25 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.