Becker 27 vs C&C 26 Wave
How do the Becker 27 and C&C 26 Wave compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Becker 27 | C&C 26 Wave | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.6 ft8.12 m | 26.7 ft8.13 m |
| Waterline length | 21.2 ft6.45 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 4,700 lb2,132 kg |
| Ballast | 2,205 lb1,000 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Sail area | 301 ft²28.0 m² | 292 ft²27.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.81 | 16.65 |
| Displacement / Length | 229 | 172 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.6 | 15.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.12 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €3,400 | — |
Becker 27 vs C&C 26 Wave: the short version
- The Becker 27 and C&C 26 Wave are close in length (26.6 ft8.12 m vs 26.7 ft8.13 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Becker 27 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Becker 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Becker 27 rates better for offshore work (2.12 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.