Beneteau 361 vs Beneteau Figaro 3
How do the Beneteau 361 and Beneteau Figaro 3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 361 
Beneteau Figaro 3 | Beneteau 361 | Beneteau Figaro 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.4 ft11.10 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 31.1 ft9.47 m | 31.0 ft9.46 m |
| Beam | 12.5 ft3.81 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 13,349 lb6,055 kg | 6,393 lb2,900 kg |
| Ballast | 4,156 lb1,885 kg | 2,449 lb1,111 kg |
| Sail area | 592 ft²55.0 m² | 753 ft²70.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 34.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 198 | 95 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.8 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Beneteau 361 vs Beneteau Figaro 3: the short version
- The Beneteau 361 is the larger boat at 36.4 ft11.10 m LOA versus 35.7 ft10.89 m for the Beneteau Figaro 3.
- The Beneteau 361 is heavier, displacing about 109% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 3 carries the more powerful rig (35.0 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 361 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 361 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.