Bermuda 40 vs C&C 41
How do the Bermuda 40 and C&C 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bermuda 40 | Bermuda 40 | C&C 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.8 ft12.42 m | 40.8 ft12.42 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.48 m | 33.3 ft10.16 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.58 m | 12.9 ft3.94 m |
| Draft | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 7.8 ft2.38 m |
| Displacement | 19,000 lb8,618 kg | 17,500 lb7,938 kg |
| Ballast | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Sail area | 648 ft²60.2 m² | 812 ft²75.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.56 | 19.27 |
| Displacement / Length | 394 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 25.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.76 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.7 |
Bermuda 40 vs C&C 41: the short version
- The Bermuda 40 and C&C 41 are close in length (40.8 ft12.42 m vs 40.8 ft12.42 m ).
- The Bermuda 40 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 41 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 14.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bermuda 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bermuda 40 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.