Bianca 26/28 vs Mirage 275
How do the Bianca 26/28 and Mirage 275 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bianca 26/28 | Bianca 26/28 | Mirage 275 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.6 ft8.40 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.60 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 5,071 lb2,300 kg | 6,800 lb3,084 kg |
| Ballast | 2,205 lb1,000 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Sail area | 431 ft²40.0 m² | 334 ft²31.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.36 | 14.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 283 | 267 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.2 | 20.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 2.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €6,100 | — |
Bianca 26/28 vs Mirage 275: the short version
- The Bianca 26/28 and Mirage 275 are close in length (27.6 ft8.40 m vs 27.5 ft8.38 m ).
- The Mirage 275 is heavier, displacing about 34% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bianca 26/28 carries the more powerful rig (23.4 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirage 275 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bianca 26/28 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.