Birdie 24 vs Dana 24
How do the Birdie 24 and Dana 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Birdie 24 
Dana 24 | Birdie 24 | Dana 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.1 ft7.36 m | 24.2 ft7.36 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 21.4 ft6.53 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 8.6 ft2.62 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.24 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 3,100 lb1,406 kg |
| Sail area | 355 ft²33.0 m² | 360 ft²33.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.66 | 15.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 219 | 336 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.3 | 29.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
Birdie 24 vs Dana 24: the short version
- The Birdie 24 and Dana 24 are close in length (24.1 ft7.36 m vs 24.2 ft7.36 m ).
- The Dana 24 is heavier, displacing about 86% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Birdie 24 carries the more powerful rig (22.7 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dana 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dana 24 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.