Blazer 23 vs Granada 23
How do the Blazer 23 and Granada 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Blazer 23 | Blazer 23 | Granada 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 23.0 ft7.02 m |
| Waterline length | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 3,307 lb1,500 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 260 ft²24.2 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.59 | 20.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 149 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 16.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.44 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €4,000 |
Blazer 23 vs Granada 23: the short version
- The Blazer 23 and Granada 23 are close in length (23.0 ft7.01 m vs 23.0 ft7.02 m ).
- The Granada 23 is heavier, displacing about 50% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Blazer 23 carries the more powerful rig (24.6 vs 21.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Granada 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Granada 23 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.