Buccaneer 210 vs Yngling
How do the Buccaneer 210 and Yngling compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Buccaneer 210 
Yngling | Buccaneer 210 | Yngling | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Waterline length | 18.3 ft5.59 m | 15.4 ft4.70 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 3.4 ft1.05 m |
| Displacement | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 683 lb310 kg |
| Sail area | 198 ft²18.4 m² | 156 ft²14.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.23 | 20.71 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 161 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.2 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.3 |
Buccaneer 210 vs Yngling: the short version
- The Buccaneer 210 and Yngling are close in length (20.8 ft6.35 m vs 20.8 ft6.35 m ).
- The Buccaneer 210 is heavier, displacing about 127% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Yngling carries the more powerful rig (20.7 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 210 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Yngling rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.