Cal 2-25 vs Cal 2-27
How do the Cal 2-25 and Cal 2-27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 2-25 
Cal 2-27 | Cal 2-25 | Cal 2-27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.70 m | 26.6 ft8.10 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.1 ft6.73 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 4,500 lb2,041 kg | 6,700 lb3,039 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 3,100 lb1,406 kg |
| Sail area | 315 ft²29.3 m² | 375 ft²34.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.49 | 16.88 |
| Displacement / Length | 189 | 278 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.2 | 22.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Cal 2-25 vs Cal 2-27: the short version
- The Cal 2-27 is the larger boat at 26.6 ft8.10 m LOA versus 25.3 ft7.70 m for the Cal 2-25.
- The Cal 2-27 is heavier, displacing about 49% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 2-25 carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 16.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 2-27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 2-27 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.