Cal 27 vs Laurin 28
How do the Cal 27 and Laurin 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 27 | Cal 27 | Laurin 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.3 ft8.33 m | 27.4 ft8.34 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.81 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Displacement | 5,400 lb2,449 kg | 7,275 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 2,725 lb1,236 kg | 3,527 lb1,600 kg |
| Sail area | 349 ft²32.4 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.14 | 12.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.8 | 27.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.05 | 1.69 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | — | €4,900 |
Cal 27 vs Laurin 28: the short version
- The Cal 27 and Laurin 28 are close in length (27.3 ft8.33 m vs 27.4 ft8.34 m ).
- The Laurin 28 is heavier, displacing about 35% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 27 carries the more powerful rig (18.1 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Laurin 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Laurin 28 rates better for offshore work (1.69 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.