Cal 9.2 vs Seafarer 30
How do the Cal 9.2 and Seafarer 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 9.2 | Cal 9.2 | Seafarer 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.13 m | 29.9 ft9.13 m |
| Waterline length | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 8,600 lb3,901 kg |
| Ballast | 2,730 lb1,238 kg | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Sail area | 388 ft²36.0 m² | 389 ft²36.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.96 | 14.83 |
| Displacement / Length | 190 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.0 | 23.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Cal 9.2 vs Seafarer 30: the short version
- The Cal 9.2 and Seafarer 30 are close in length (30.0 ft9.13 m vs 29.9 ft9.13 m ).
- The Seafarer 30 is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 9.2 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Seafarer 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Seafarer 30 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.