Catalina 320 vs Maxi 999
How do the Catalina 320 and Maxi 999 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Catalina 320 
Maxi 999 | Catalina 320 | Maxi 999 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.5 ft9.91 m | 32.5 ft9.91 m |
| Waterline length | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 26.9 ft8.20 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.58 m | 10.6 ft3.23 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.97 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 11,300 lb5,126 kg | 9,259 lb4,200 kg |
| Ballast | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 3,307 lb1,500 kg |
| Sail area | 520 ft²48.3 m² | 635 ft²59.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.52 | 23.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 230 | 212 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.4 | 21.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 6.9 |
| Average used price | — | €37,000 |
Catalina 320 vs Maxi 999: the short version
- The Catalina 320 and Maxi 999 are close in length (32.5 ft9.91 m vs 32.5 ft9.91 m ).
- The Catalina 320 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi 999 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Catalina 320 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi 999 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.