C&C 110 vs Rival 22
How do the C&C 110 and Rival 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 110 | C&C 110 | Rival 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.07 m | 36.3 ft11.07 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 27.1 ft8.25 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 5,732 lb2,600 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 706 ft²65.6 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.98 | 22.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 129 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.7 | 18.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | — | €7,900 |
C&C 110 vs Rival 22: the short version
- The C&C 110 and Rival 22 are close in length (36.3 ft11.07 m vs 36.3 ft11.07 m ).
- The C&C 110 is heavier, displacing about 90% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 110 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 22.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 110 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Rival 22 rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.